Photographic Excellence: How to critic your own photos

It has been said the most difficult thing for man to do is to judge his or her creative work, objectively.

Be honest, can you tell when your work seems to be missing something? More importantly do you know what it is that’s missing? You can only improve your photos if you set a high photo standard to compare yourself against.

When Time-Life selected 250 photos for the Great Photographers volume of their Time-Life Photography series; they chose 68 photographers out of thousands. Those editors defined “great” photographers based on three main factors.

3 Characteristics of a Great Photographer

The first factor was intent. What did the photographer have in mind when he took the photo, and did he achieve it? For example, did the photographer successfully make the viewer feel empathy when taking pictures of survivors of a major natural disaster?

The second factor was technical skill. Did the photographer show a thorough understanding of composition, light, exposure, and design?

The final factor was consistency. Did the photographer have just one or two great shots, or did they produce success time and time again?.

Intent, skill, and consistency are the same three factors that will determine your own greatness. Study the masters like Ansel Adams, Larry Burrows, Richard Avedon and Annie Leibovitz and you will see these three factors again and again. But the question remains, how do you get from where you are now to that level?

Have you ever heard the phrase, “being your own worse critic”? By the very nature of the words being used, most people tend to think of that as a negative phrase, when in reality, nothing could be further from the truth. To learn and grow in photography, you have to be strong enough to admit what does and does not work in your photos.

To that end, here is a strength and weakness checklist for you to use when reviewing your own photographs. It’s not complicated, just look at your photo and mark whether it is strong or weak. There is no middle gray; your image either succeeds or it does not. Once you know your weaknesses you can work on improving in those areas.

Photo Critique Checklist

Intent – Could any viewer look at this photo and know what you had in mind?

Emotional Impact – Can this photo be described with words of emotion, like peace, calmness, anger, rage, joy, or sadness? Does your photo make an emotional statement?

Center of interest – When composing your images do you successfully direct your viewer’s attention to a specific point? Would the viewer know where your center of interest is?

Illusion of depth– Have you used framing, balance, contrast, and other art concepts to make your image jump off the page, or does it just sit there?

Subject/background contrast. Does your subject stand out?

Personal style – Ansel Adams was known for extreme illusion of depth and all planes in very sharp focus. There is nothing in this world that does not have a decisive moment. How will others describe your unique approach?

Selective focus – Do you choose where the viewer will look? If the background is just as sharp as the foreground, things can become very visually confusing.

Composition – Do you consistently use the rule of thirds, formal or informal balance, and leading lines? Take control of where the viewer’s eyes are most likely to fall in your image.

Exposure – Do you always shoot at whatever the camera says, or do you take control of the light? Can you see details in your shadows? Have you ever used a reflector or bounced a flash as opposed to straight on?

Story telling – Is there a feeling of movement within your image, or does it just sit there? Does it leave anything to the imagination, or is it just a statement of what is? If your image doesn’t tell a story, there is no reason to give it a second glance. Great photos make you want to look again and again.

Knowing what areas to improve is the first step in becoming a better photographer.

SHARE THIS STORY
Comments
EXPAND
Add a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.